Microcontroller Projects for Hobbyists:
» PICAXE Microcontroller
» Arduino Microcontroller
Deism versus Islam
The Truth About Jonathan Pollard
by John Loftus
Date: May 23, 2003
When American intelligence broke the Soviet wartime
code, we learned that the Soviets had infiltrated the
The American intelligence
community's penchant for secrecy and its refusal to
admit that it had been infiltrated was so great that
it failed to disclose this to President Harry S.
Truman. This is how Daniel Patrick Moynihan described
"The Soviets knew we knew they knew we knew. The only
one who didn't know was the President of the United
States. Our politics was injured for 30 years by
this."-Quoted in the New York Times, March 30, 2002
There is a good reason why neither Congress nor the
American Jewish leadership supports the release of
Jonathan Pollard from prison:
They all were told a
lie-a humongous Washington whopper of a lie. The lie
was first whispered in the "bubble," the secret
intelligence briefing room on Capitol Hill, but it
Just before Pollard's sentencing, Senator Chic Hecht
of Nevada, a senior member of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, telephoned the leaders of every major
Jewish organization to warn them not to support
Pollard in any way.
Pollard had done something so
horrible that it could never be made public. Several
senior intelligence sources confirmed the message: No
matter how harsh the sentence, Jewish leaders had to
keep their mouths shut; don't make a martyr out of
Washington insiders thought they knew the big, dark
secret. David Luchins, an aide to Senator. Daniel Patrick
Moynihan, announced to reporters that he had seen
"secret documents confirming that Pollard's spying had
resulted in the loss of lives of U.S. intelligence
agents." Luchins later recanted his statement, but not
until the damage had already been done.
Pollard had supposedly given Israel a list of every
American spy inside the Soviet Union. On several
occasions Soviet agents in New York had posed as
Israelis. The CIA reasoned that was also true in
The Mossad had been infiltrated by one or more
Soviet spies. In the trade this is called a "false
flag" operation: Your enemy poses as your ally and
steals your secrets.
In this case, the CIA reasoned in
attempting to explain its horrendous losses, Pollard
had passed the information to Israel he had stolen,
which in turn fell victim to the "false flag"
Soviet agents in Israel, posing as Israeli
intelligence agents, passed the information to Moscow,
which then wiped out American human assets in the
Pollard hadn't meant for this to happen, but the
result of the "false flag" mistake was mass murder. In
a matter of months, every spy we had in Russia-more
than 40 agents-had been captured or killed. At least
that was the accusation, but the basis for it had been
kept secret from Pollard and his defense counsel.
The public could not be told the horrifying truth:
American intelligence had gone blind behind the Iron
Curtain-we had lost all our networks, as the
intelligence community publicly admitted more than a
The Soviets could have attacked the
United States without warning. Everyone who knew at
the time (including me) blamed Pollard.
On March 5, 1987, at 2:22 p.m., the sentencing hearing
in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., began in
Criminal Case No. 86-207, United States of America v.
Jonathan Jay Pollard.
The prosecutors produced a
secret letter and memo from Secretary of Defense
Caspar "Cap" Weinberger referring to the "enormous"
harm that Pollard had done to our national security.
In his memo, Weinberger directly accused Pollard of
betraying America's "sources and methods," which is to
say, he had betrayed our spies in foreign countries.
Weinberger publicly stated that Pollard was the worst
spy in American history: "It is difficult for me, even
in the so-called year of the spy, to conceive of a
greater harm to national security than that caused by
Despite his plea agreement to the
contrary with the government, Pollard was given the
maximum sentence, life in prison. Weinberger later
said that he wished Pollard had been shot.
A week after the sentencing, the Washington Times
reported that the United States had identified Shabtai
Kalmanovich as the Soviet spy in Israel who supposedly
worked for the Mossad but was actually working for the
KGB; he had betrayed American secrets to Moscow.
Kalmanovich had been flying under a false flag.
Washington insiders winked knowingly at one another:
Pollard's contact in Israel had been caught.
Just to make sure that Pollard was blamed, U.S.
intelligence sources, several months later, leaked
word to the press of the Kalmanovich connection.
"A Russian mole has infiltrated the Mossad and is
transmitting highly sensitive American intelligence
information to the Russians," was the report flashed
around the world by United Press International on Dec.
14, 1987. Citing "American intelligence sources," the
UPI announced that the "sensitive intelligence
material relayed to Israel by Jonathan Pollard had
reached the KGB."
But it was all untrue. Every bit of it. Pollard wasn't
the serial killer. The Jew didn't do it. It was one of
their own WASPs-Aldrich Ames, a drunken senior CIA
official who sold the names of America's agents to the
Russians for cash.
Pollard was framed for Ames's
crime, while Ames kept on drinking and spying for the
Soviets for several more years. In fact, Israeli
intelligence later suspected that Ames played a direct
role in framing Pollard. But no one in America then
knew the truth.
Ames was arrested in February 1994, and confessed to
selling out American agents in the Soviet Union, but
not all of them. It was only logical to assume that
Pollard had betrayed the rest of them, as one former
CIA official admitted shortly after Ames's arrest.
Even one life lost was too many. So Pollard continued
to rot in jail. No one dreamed that yet another
high-level Washington insider had sold us out to
Years passed, and eventually a
Russian defector told the truth. A senior FBI
official-Special Agent Robert Hanssen-had betrayed the
rest of our agents. Hanssen was arrested in February
2001, and soon confessed in order to avoid the death
penalty. He was sentenced to life in prison without
Would the Americans now admit that they had been
conned into blaming Pollard? Beltway bureaucrats do
not readily admit to mistakes of this magnitude.
Instead, they convinced themselves that Pollard might
still be at least partly to blame for the worst
debacle in U.S. intelligence history.
analyst from the National Security Council, looking
for something to pin on Pollard, had his own theory.
Maybe the Russians didn't initially believe that their
own spies (Ames and Hanssen) had procured all the
names of U.S. agents in the Soviet Union. Maybe
Pollard's list tipped the scales.
Such things had happened before. Once again,
Washington insiders circled their alphabet agencies to
fire back at the critics who dared to suggest that
Pollard might have been innocent of the major charge
Meanwhile, deep inside the Navy's intelligence
service, a low-level decision was made to re-examine
the Pollard case in view of the convictions of Ames
and Hanssen. With sickening chagrin, the Navy
discovered that the evidence needed to clear Pollard
had been under its nose all along.
As my source in Naval intelligence explained, the list
of our secret agents inside Russia had been kept in a
special safe in a special room with a special "blue
stripe" clearance needed for access.
When I was a
lawyer in the Justice Department and would be sent
over to the CIA to do research, I was permitted to use
only a blue-striped, CIA-issue legal pad for
note-taking. Nothing with a blue stripe could leave
the building without being scrutinized by CIA
But Jonathan Pollard didn't have "blue stripe"
clearance, according to intelligence sources I spoke
with. That was the bombshell that would clear him of
any possible connection to the deaths of our Russian
Just to make sure, I checked it out, even visiting
Pollard in prison to confirm it. Sure enough, there is
no way on earth Jonathan Pollard could have entered
the file room, let alone the safe where the list was
But the intelligence community's failure to catch this
and thereby discredit a critical piece of
prosecutorial evidence was, to put it mildly, a bit of
an oversight. Some would say it was an obscene
I regard it as an understandable mistake that
was overlooked in the avalanche of phony evidence the
KGB was planting that pointed to Pollard and away from
Ames and Hanssen, whom the Soviets wanted to protect.
Both of them had "blue stripe" clearance, as was well
documented in several books that have been written on
each man and his exploits.
The lack of "blue stripe" clearance was the final
proof that Pollard could not possibly have betrayed
our Russian agents. It should certainly have gotten
him a new hearing. As a former federal prosecutor, I
can state that it would be hard to rebut this kind of
The Justice Department, in one of its briefs, had
specifically mentioned the "false flag" theory as
grounds to support Pollard's heavy sentence, arguing
in part, that spying even for friendly countries can
be damaging if information ultimately falls into the
wrong hands. In this, the Justice Department had
unwittingly misled the judge. Weinberger also raised
the "false flag" issue in his top-secret memorandum to
The only possible way to uphold the sentence might be
the "harmless error" doctrine. The government could
admit that Pollard had never stolen the Russian agent
list, but so what? Maybe he had passed other
information that was equally damaging, so he would
still deserve to remain in prison for the rest of his
The problem with the "harmless error" strategy is that
the rest of the material that Pollard gave the
Israelis was itself pretty harmless.
In fact, the original damage assessment from the
intelligence community confirmed that the impact on
our national security-of the release of information
other than the agent names-was not serious.
assessment came after Pollard's initial grand jury
appearance, but before the Soviets began to frame
Pollard with the phony Kalmanovich connection. No less
a figure than Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Leeper
had characterized damage caused by the release of the
information that Pollard actually gave Israel as
The reason America suffered so little harm is simple:
Pollard was stealing Soviet secrets for Israel, not
American secrets for the Soviets. Before the fall of
communism, the Soviets were shipping guns to nearly
every terrorist group in the Middle East.
that U.S. intelligence had been ordered to share this
information with Israel-under an executive order
signed by President Reagan-but had not done so.
In fact, as Pollard himself admitted in one of my
three prison interviews, many, if not most, of the
documents he handed over were cover sheets showing the
titles of files that the U.S. was supposed to share
with Israel, but were holding back.
government, according to Israeli intelligence sources,
mistakenly counted the cover sheets as if they were
full files and came up with the mythical "room full of
stolen documents," instead of the small boxfulls or so
that Pollard actually passed.)
In the long run,
though, the issue is not how many boxes Pollard
passed, but whether anything he gave Israel did harm
After the government's "false flag" theory was blown
up by the "blue stripe" discovery, the anti-Pollard
members of the intelligence community had to come up
with a new PR campaign for damage control.
In order to
justify Pollard's life sentence, they had to show that
he did do some potentially catastrophic damage to
America. What they came up with was a bit of a
stretch. Pollard had given Israel a set of radio
frequency guidebooks, a worldwide listing of
short-wave radio bands.
It takes a lot of time and
money to compile one of these guides, but essentially
they are just publicly available information, openly
deduced by listening to who is talking to whom on
which radio bands.
Seymour Hersh is a famous reporter and long-time
friend. (I was his secret source in his 1983 book The
Price of Power-Kissinger in Nixon's White House
But Sy had his leg pulled on Pollard
by his CIA sources, as a result of which Sy published
a story in the New Yorker in January 1999 claiming
that these radio guides were just about the crown
jewels of U.S. intelligence.
The truth is that certain
portions of the guide had already been sold to the
Soviets by the Walker spy ring, according to courtroom
testimony, which also revealed that the Soviets
thought so little of the guides' value that they did
not even bother to ask their top spies, Ames and
Hanssen, to steal the remainder of the set.
as previously noted, the government's own damage
assessment report originally concluded that the loss
of the guides was a minor matter.
So much for the crown jewels. If that is the best spin
the intelligence community can come up with, Pollard
is probably entitled to immediate release for time
The truth is that without the "false flag"
theory, and the accompanying "worst spy in history"
hysteria, Pollard would probably have been served no
more than five years in prison. He has already served
After 9/11, though, I began to realize that Pollard's
tale was only the beginning of a much bigger story
about a major America intelligence scandal, which is
the subject of a book I am now working on.
Jonathan Pollard did not realize it, he had stumbled
across the darkest secret in the Reagan
It is one of the reasons that
I am serving as the intelligence advisor on a
trillion-dollar federal lawsuit filed in August 2002
against the Saudis on behalf of the victims of 9/11.
Pollard in fact did steal something that the U.S.
government never wishes to talk about. Several friends
inside military intelligence have told me that Pollard
gave the Israelis a roster that listed the identities
of all the Saudi and other Arab intelligence agents we
knew about as of 1984.
(This has been corroborated by
Israeli sources, as well.) At that time, this list,
known in intelligence circles as the "blue book,"
would have been relatively unimportant to the United
States-but not to Israel.
Since 9/11, however, Pollard's "blue book" is of
profound interest to everyone, including the U.S.
These particular agents are now a major embarrassment
to the Saudis and to the handful of American spy
chiefs who had employed these Saudi intelligence
agents on the sly.
Some of the names on this list-such
as Osama Bin Laden-turned out to be leaders of
terrorist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood and
what we now call Al Qaeda.
In hindsight, we now know that Pollard stole the one
book-that, incidentally, was alluded to in
Weinberger's secret memorandum-that unquestionably
proves that the Americans knew as early as 1984 about
the connection between the Saudis and terrorist
How does this all fit together? During the Reagan-Bush
administrations, the National Security Council wanted
to throw the Soviets out of Afghanistan using Arab
soldiers instead of American. It seemed like a good
idea at the time, but no one thought about the
In imitation of the Soviet
strategy of hiring terrorists, we asked the Saudis to
recruit a proxy army of Islamic terrorists whom we
would supply with guns and pay indirectly, according
to intelligence sources. By having the Saudis hire the
"freedom fighters," we could avoid embarrassing
questions in Congress about giving the taxpayers money
to known Arab terrorists.
In 1982, I went on "60 Minutes" to expose Nazi war
criminals I had been assigned to prosecute who were
then working for the CIA. It was one of those Cold War
blunders. The CIA didn't have a clue it was dealing
with Nazi war criminals.
It thought they were "freedom
fighters." In 1985, I ended up testifying before the
U.S. House Judiciary Committee about Nazis on the
Sadly, the only lesson the intelligence bosses learned
was to put the bad guys on someone else's payroll (the
Saudis for one), and then reimburse them under the
Because of my whistle-blowing during the early
1980s, the CIA was still pretty sensitive about hiring
Nazi "freedom fighters" without background checks, so
they were mostly kept out of the loop about the Arab
terrorists hired clandestinely by the Saudis to fight
the Soviets in Afghanistan.
The Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan in 1989. The
naive Americans walked away from the Frankenstein
monster they had created, but the cynical Saudis kept
the terrorists on the payroll. From the Saudi
perspective, it was safer to keep paying the
terrorists groups to attack Israel, Bosnia or Chechnya
rather than letting them all back into Saudi Arabia.
As one U.S. intelligence bureaucrat cynically confided
to me, "Sure we knew that the Saudis were giving money
to terrorist groups, but they were only killing Jews,
they weren't killing Americans."
In this "Keystone Cops" affair, one wing of U.S.
intelligence was hunting terrorists while another
winked at the Saudis' recruitment of them. I have
spoken to numerous FBI and CIA counter-terrorist
agents, all of whom tell a similar story.
FBI or CIA came close to uncovering the Saudi
terrorist connection, their investigations were
mysteriously terminated. In hindsight, I can only
conclude that some of our own Washington bureaucrats
have been protecting the Al Qaeda leadership and their
oil-rich Saudi backers from investigation for more
than a decade.
I am not the only one to reach this conclusion. In his
autobiography, Oliver North confirmed that every time
he wanted to do something about terrorism, Weinberger
stopped him because it might upset the Saudis and
jeopardize the flow of oil to the U.S. John O'Neill, a
former FBI agent and our nation's top Al Qaeda expert,
stated in a 2001 book written by Jean Charles Brisard,
a noted French intelligence analyst, that everything
we wanted to know about terrorism could be found in
O'Neill warned the Beltway bosses repeatedly that if
the Saudis were to continue funding Al Qaeda, it would
end up costing American lives, according to several
intelligence sources. As long as the oil kept flowing,
they just shrugged.
Outraged by the Saudi cover-up,
O'Neill quit the FBI and became the new chief of
security at the World Trade Center. In a bitter irony,
the man who could have exposed his bosses' continuous
cover-up of the Saudi-Al Qaeda link was himself killed
by Al Qaeda on 9/11.
Congress has been told repeatedly that American
intelligence never knew the identities of the Arabs
who threw the Soviets out of Afghanistan.
Inadvertently, Pollard stole the ultimate smoking gun
that shows exactly what the leaders of our
intelligence community knew and when they knew it.
"blue book" Pollard stole flatly establishes that all
the dots were connected many years before 9/11, and
the only thing the intelligence chiefs did competently
was cover up the fact that we had long known about the
In the ultimate irony, Pollard may have to be let out
of prison to testify before Congress about the
negligence of his own superiors. Like O'Neill, Pollard
had tried to warn his superiors that a wave of
terrorism was coming out of the Middle East, but no
one would listen.
Pollard himself told me this.
Pollard has admitted-to me and in writing to President
Clinton-that he was wrong and stupid in passing the
information to Israel on his own, but in the long run
he may have committed the most unpardonable sin of
all: He was right and the bureaucrats were wrong.
Pollard never thought he was betraying his country.
And he never did, although he clearly violated its
laws. He just wanted to help protect Israelis and
Americans from terrorists.
Now in prison for nearly
two decades, Pollard, who is in his late 40s, grows
more ill year by year. If, as seems likely, American
bureaucrats choose to fight a prolonged delaying
action over a new hearing, Pollard will probably die
There are people in power inside the
Beltway who have been playing for time. Time for them
ran out on 9/11. Sooner or later, they are going to be
held accountable. I hope that Pollard lives to see it.
From http://www.momentmag.com/features/feat1.html (Site is down.)
Excerpts from Will Durant's The Age of Faith Pages 162-186 Pub. 1950
Gateway Pages for this website:
» Archive 1
» Archive 2
» Archive 3
» Archive 4
» Archive 5
» Archive 6
» Challenge to Atheists
Religion and History
[ Deism ] [
Gnosticism ] [
Christianity ] [
Judaism ] [
Web site © Copyright Lewis Loflin, All rights reserved.
If using this material on another site, please provide a link back to my site.