Useful Science Information on Climate Change Industry
Thanks to by Nicolas Loris.
Some of the comments that added useful information.
Jerry Zacny · Southern Illinois University Carbondale
The EPA in concept is a needed regulatory agency. but like many good ideas, there are always unintended consequences. What those who run government agencies seem to forget is the concept of "moderation in all things". Too much can be as bad as too little.
Government agencies are like living things and there are those in government who believe "If you are not growing, you are dying." The more rules and regulations they can implement, the more bureaucrats are needed to enforce those rules and regulations.
As the number of bureaucrats grow, the more opportunities for ambitious bureaucrats to advance to higher positions within these agencies (Assistant Directors, Deputy Directors and Directors, each with their own offices and staff, each with higher pay grades and perks). The rationale (excuse) of course is always "to serve the public". If we aren't careful, the government will protect us out of all we own, for our own good of course.
Larry Frazer · Hot Springs Village, Arkansas
Climate change due to man's activity is pure BS. Climate change has been going on since the beginning of time and will continue regardless of what this little inhabitant human does. Man needs to understand what this natural climate change cycle means and learn to live with it, perhaps first is to stop building on the shoreline or at least don't bail out anyone who does.
12,000 years ago most of N America was buried under a 1 MILE thick glacier. (not that long ago,) Where did it go and why? There were only about 2 million humans on the planet at the time. Until that change in our climate can be explained, all of today's 'sky is falling' scare tactics is bovine excrement. Yes!! clean up our environment and stop pollution, but do it for legitimate reasons.
Ken Marx · California State University at San Francisco
There are countless products and services that once were available and no longer are. Why? Because they weren't profitable or lacked sufficient demand. Businesses are started all the time and fail within short order. On the other hand, a lot of businesses have succeeded over the years because they found an economical way to manufacture a product or service that people needed or desired and were willing to pay for.
So called renewable energy is not among the winners. First of all, both solar and wind cost more to produce than fossil fuels. Second, both solar and wind kill wildlife. Third, they are not a pleasant site to see on every mountain and hillside. Having said that, I would be the first to applaud should they find a way to produce more value than they consume.
Finally, enterprises using money invested by private individuals always find a way to maximize their investment. Having your own money at risk is a greater incentive than simply using funds granted by some government agency.
As for global warming or climate change or whatever you want to label it, there is ample evidence that global temperatures have gone up and down throughout the history of the earth, not just since man started to populate the earth, or the industrial revolution, or anything else man has done. Climate change is a fact. So is the need for all of the greenies beloved trees for Carbon Dioxide. Ultimately, the earth will balance itself out without our help.
Marc Jeric · UCLA
World-renowned physicist and Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman's admonition has been largely discarded in the halls of academia. "I would rather have questions that can't be answered," he said, "than answers that can't be questioned." Sadly, answers that none dare question now dominate classroom life led by liberals, progressives, socialists, communists, Marxists, "social sciences" professors, Democrats, union goons, and other such low-lives, slime, and scum of this once free country.
The main vehicle today for this war on dissent is the Global Warming hoax which, - after 20 consecutive years of GLOBAL COOLING, had to be renamed as the Climate Change scam by that coterie of government-paid drones under the supervision of the UN socialist panel. In preparation for that Paris Conference last December the fakers had to "recalibrate their instruments", and to "refine their computer models" to "demonstrate further warming" retroactively.
A number of our socialist Marxist attorney generals are getting ready to sue those doubters; well there are some 32,000 such scientists and professionals to be sued: find their names on the Internet under "Oregon Petition" and "Manhattan Declaration". And I am one of them: MS, PhD, Engineering, UCLA, with specialties in Heat & Mass Transfer and in Thermodynamics. Hello creeps, sue me if you dare!
And I will counter-sue you for some $3 trillion government dollars which that far-left coterie absorbed so far. A growing number of our universities are preparing to forbid access to their students by those "criminal doubters and deniers". That is just a sick repetition of those medieval religious inquisition courts against the non-believers, and of those Stalin's show-trials against non-conformists.
- Fall of the Late Roman Empire
- End of the Vikings in Greenland
- Lost Colony of Roanoke Island
- Whale Fossils Show Ice Free Arctic
- Modern Humans Originate in Asia 80,000 Years Ago
- Hurricanes Versus Climate Change
- Dinosaur Extinction New Questions
- Massive Meteor Explosion Kills Stone Age America
- Mythical Flood or Meteor Strike?
- Useful Science Information on Climate Change Industry
- Climate Change Gravy Train on the Defensive
- Religion is Killing Children
- Science Proves Climate Change
- Debunking Panendeism
- Does Pantheism Lead to Leftism?
- Separation of Religion and State
- Disclosure Law Threatens EPA-Industrial Complex
- Al Gore Fusing Christianity to Environmentalism
- Green Religion Won't Save Appalachia
- Hypsithermal Warming Spreads Civilization
- Shockingly Rapid Climatic Shifts are Real
- How Warmer Climate Can Mean More Life
- Innovation and Technology Not Earth-Centered Religion Part 1
- Innovation and Technology Not Earth-Centered Religion Part 2
- Religious Fundamentalism Explained by Michael Crichton.
- Biocentrism vs. Science
- Science vs. Environmentalism
- Toxicity Of Environmentalism
- There's No Man-Made Global Mass Extinction
- Bikini Atoll Recovery From Nuclear Blasts
- Earth Going Green Environmentalists in Denial
- Ocean Acidification or Warming But Not Both
- Nuclear Power Green and Affordable