by Lewis Loflin
In *The Ages of Gaia*, Dr. James Lovelock recounts the remarkable story of natural nuclear fission reactors created by bacteria 1.8 billion years ago in Oklo, Gabon, challenging the irrational fears of nuclear power perpetuated by anti-nuclear activists. These reactors, which operated for millions of years, demonstrate Earth’s resilience and the safety of nuclear processes when managed properly, supporting Lovelock’s advocacy for nuclear energy as a solution to modern environmental challenges. As a Deist, I approach this topic with a focus on empirical science, countering environmentalism’s technophobia and alarmism, as I’ve critiqued in my previous articles, and advocating for practical, affordable solutions that balance human and environmental needs.
Lovelock describes a “bizarre consequence” of oxygen’s appearance on Earth during the Proterozoic Eon: the world’s first nuclear reactors, built not by human ingenuity but by “an unassertive community of modest bacteria” (*The Ages of Gaia*, p. 122). Discovered in the 1970s at the Oklo uranium mine in Gabon, Africa, these reactors were identified when a shipment of uranium was found to be depleted in the fissionable isotope 235U. Natural uranium typically contains 99.27% 238U, 0.72% 235U, and traces of 234U, but the Oklo shipment had a significantly lower 235U proportion, raising concerns of theft or sabotage by the French atomic energy agency.
The truth was far more fascinating: 1.8 billion years ago, bacteria in an algal mat at Oklo concentrated uranium from a stream, creating a critical mass that initiated a self-sustaining nuclear fission reaction. Lovelock explains, “When more than a ‘critical mass’ of uranium containing the fissionable isotope is gathered together in one place, there is a self-sustaining chain reaction” (*The Ages of Gaia*, p. 123). The reaction was moderated by water, which slowed neutrons to sustain fission; when power output increased, water boiled away, slowing the reaction—a natural self-regulating mechanism. These reactors ran at a kilowatt-power level for millions of years, depleting a significant amount of 235U.
The presence of oxygen was crucial, as uranium is insoluble in water under oxygen-free conditions but dissolves readily in oxidizing environments. As groundwater became oxygenated, uranium dissolved as the uranyl ion and was concentrated by the bacteria, eventually forming uranium oxide deposits sufficient for fission. This process, Lovelock notes, confirms an oxidizing environment in the Proterozoic, as uranium would not have been water-soluble without oxygen (*The Ages of Gaia*, p. 124).
The Oklo reactors offer a powerful lesson in Earth’s resilience, a theme I’ve explored in my homeostasis article. Lovelock highlights that these reactors operated for millions of years, with bacteria and other organisms thriving despite the radiation and “nuclear waste” produced. He writes, “The fact that the reactors ran so long and that there was more than one of them suggests that replenishment must have occurred and that the radiation and nuclear waste from the reactor was not a deterrent to that ancient bacterial ecosystem” (*The Ages of Gaia*, p. 124). The distribution of stable fission products around the site further suggests that nuclear waste disposal is “nowhere near so difficult or dangerous” as anti-nuclear activists claim, providing evidence of geophysiological homeostasis—Earth’s ability to self-regulate and adapt.
This natural phenomenon counters the hysterical claims of anti-nuclear activists, as I’ve critiqued in my technophobia article (*Science Under Siege*, p. 356). The Oklo reactors were not explosive; their self-regulating nature ensured stability, a principle mirrored in modern nuclear designs. Had such reactors formed earlier, in the Archean Eon 3.6 billion years ago, when 235U was 33% of natural uranium (compared to 0.7% today), the results could have been more dramatic, but the absence of oxygen prevented this, further illustrating Earth’s natural balance (*The Ages of Gaia*, p. 124).
Lovelock, a pioneer of the Gaia hypothesis, has long supported nuclear power, famously stating, “Only nuclear power can now halt global warming” (*The Ages of Gaia*, 1995 ed.). His advocacy, rooted in his discovery of the Oklo reactors, challenges environmentalism’s technophobic opposition to nuclear energy, which I’ve critiqued as irrational (*Science Under Siege*, p. 356). The documentary *Pandora’s Promise* further explores this perspective, highlighting how nuclear power offers a low-carbon solution to climate challenges, a point Lovelock championed despite his environmentalist credentials.
The fear of nuclear power often stems from environmentalism’s quasi-religious alarmism, as I’ve discussed in my ecoreligion article (*Science Under Siege*, p. 358). Activists portray nuclear energy as inherently dangerous, ignoring evidence like the Oklo reactors, where nature managed nuclear fission safely for millions of years. Modern reactors, with advanced designs that can recycle spent fuel, are even safer, yet face opposition from groups like the Natural Resources Defense Council, which I’ve critiqued for prioritizing ideology over science. This technophobia, as seen in Southwest Virginia’s failed green initiatives, diverts resources from practical solutions, leaving communities economically strained (*Science Under Siege*, p. 356).
The Oklo reactors, operating 1.8 billion years ago, predate human-induced CO2 concerns, yet they align with my broader perspective on climate cycles. As I’ve explored in my climateshifts and hypsithermal articles, climate has varied naturally for millennia, from rapid shifts during the Ice Age to the warming of the Hypsithermal interval (9,000–6,000 years ago), which spread agriculture and civilization. The Little Ice Age (1300–1850) and subsequent warming, driven by increased solar radiation, further illustrate this variability (*NASA*). CO2 plays a role in modern warming, but its effect is secondary to natural factors like solar activity and water vapor, which dominates at 40,000 PPM compared to CO2’s 400 PPM (*NASA*, 11/17/2008).
Modern CO2 concerns must be addressed affordably, as I’ve emphasized in my Appalachia and Southwest Virginia articles. Nuclear power offers a practical solution, reducing emissions without the economic devastation caused by blanket opposition to fossil fuels, as seen in coal-dependent regions. The Earth’s resilience, demonstrated by its adaptation to the Oklo reactors and historical climate shifts, suggests we can manage nuclear energy safely, provided we prioritize science over fear.
As a Deist, I approach nuclear power with a focus on reason and empirical data, recognizing Earth’s resilience through mechanisms like homeostasis, as I’ve explored in my climate studies. The Oklo reactors show that nature can handle nuclear fission without catastrophic consequences, countering the irrational fears perpetuated by anti-nuclear activists. Lovelock’s support for nuclear power aligns with my advocacy for practical solutions that balance environmental care with human needs, a principle I’ve emphasized in my critiques of environmentalism’s technophobia and alarmism.
In Southwest Virginia, where failed green initiatives have wasted millions, nuclear power could provide a stable, low-carbon energy source, supporting economic growth while reducing pollution. Environmentalism’s rejection of such technologies, rooted in a quasi-religious view of nature as “pristine,” ignores the needs of struggling communities, as I’ve argued (*Science Under Siege*, p. 358). We must focus on affordable solutions, ensuring transparency in science to prevent the misuse of fear-driven narratives for ideological ends.
James Lovelock, born in 1919 in Letchworth Garden City, England, is an independent scientist, inventor, and environmentalist renowned for the Gaia hypothesis, which posits Earth as a self-regulating superorganism. With a Ph.D. in medicine from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Lovelock taught at Yale, Baylor, and Harvard, and his inventions were adopted by NASA for planetary exploration, where he developed the Gaia hypothesis. Elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1974, he received the Amsterdam Prize for the Environment in 1990 and currently serves as president of the Marine Biological Association.
Lovelock authored several influential books, including *Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth* (1979), *The Ages of Gaia* (1988), and *Homage to Gaia* (2000), his autobiography. While I admire his scientific contributions, I share your reservations about the religious undertones in his Gaia hypothesis, which I’ve critiqued in my ecoreligion article as part of environmentalism’s quasi-religious trend. Nonetheless, his support for nuclear power, grounded in evidence like the Oklo reactors, aligns with my Deist emphasis on reason and science.
The Oklo reactors, created by bacteria 1.8 billion years ago, offer a compelling counter to anti-nuclear fears, demonstrating that nuclear fission can occur naturally and safely. By embracing nuclear power, as Lovelock advocates, we can address modern environmental challenges like CO2 emissions without succumbing to technophobic alarmism. Environmentalism must shed its quasi-religious biases and focus on science-driven solutions that support both the planet and its people. With Earth’s resilience as our guide, we can navigate the future with reason, not fear, ensuring a sustainable balance for all.
Updated 2025 by Lewis Loflin. Extracts from *The Ages of Gaia* by James Lovelock.
Acknowledgment: I’d like to thank Grok, an AI by xAI, for helping me draft and refine this article. The final edits and perspective are my own.
Click to Visit!
