Bombay station covered in blood.

Bombay India Slaughter by Muslims for Islam Ignored by the Press

by Lewis Loflin

A week after Muslim terrorists killed almost 200 people in Bombay (Mumbai) India we get silence. No Muslims in India or elsewhere have poured into the streets to protest the name of Islam being justified for mass murder but instead deflect the atrocity off onto Pakistani politics and stories of Muslim victims killed by Hindus.

The "experts" and the mainstream press are "careful" in what they say and who they blame. My local newspaper The Bristol Herald Courier ran a long story about Alan Scherr (58) and his daughter Naomi Scherr (13) members of a New Age religious cult in Nelson County, VA.

Both died in Bombay in a hail of Muslim terrorist bullets. They were among a group of 16 Americans, four Canadians and five Australians in Mumbai on a spiritual pilgrimage to India. It was great advertising for the Synchronicity Foundation cult, but in no article could I find the identity of their killers.

See Synchronicity Foundation Cult in Virginia

But PC censorship didn't stop with my local newspaper.

Indian Commandos Storm Jewish Center

New York Times November 28, 2008

News reports claim "a hundred shots were heard from inside Nariman House, home to the Orthodox Jewish group Chabad Lubavitch." The dead included a Jewish Rabbi and his wife, executed by Muslim terrorists. (Their young son was saved by a nanny that managed to flee with him. The child would have been murdered too.)

They were among the over 170 murdered by Islamist gunmen that went on a random killing and murder spree in Bombay, India. The targets included restaurants, hotels, even street vendors and a hospital.

Most of the dead were Hindus, I suppose the Jewish couple was engaged in Zionist' imperialism and since they were allowed to live in India, killing Indian Hindus must have seemed justified.

To quote another report,

"The center is run by Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka. The couple's 2-year-old son was escorted out of the building several hours after the attack, his clothing soaked in blood, the AP reported. Five non-Indians -- an Australian, a Briton, a German, an Italian and a Japanese -- were reported killed."

The above words such as Muslim and Islam would never have been printed in the New York Times. In fact, it would have been nearly impossible to figure out who the killers really were and their motives.

To quote, "There remained much mystery around the group behind the attack, unusual in its scale, its almost theatrical boldness and its targeting of locales frequented by wealthy Indians and foreigners."

It sounds almost like admiration. Two "gunmen" called a local TV station and said, "Are you aware how many people have been killed in Kashmir? Are you aware how your army has killed Muslims?"

There is no mystery, they were Muslims. They murdered non-Muslims in the name of radical Islam. The Jewish couple had nothing to do with Kashmir nor did a father and his 13-year-old daughter from my state of Virginia have anything to do with Kashmir.

The New York Times completely, in the name of political correctness, lied about the true nature of this slaughter.

It deflected blame from the real cause and even helped hide the identity of the terrorists, and acted as a sounding board for their attempts to turn Kashmir into another Islamist hell.

We know very well Pakistan was behind this just as they are behind Taliban attacks in Afghanistan. Pakistan is a de-facto Muslim terrorist state, not a US ally.

The money and training for this attack likely originated in Saudi Arabia, whose state-sponsored Wahhabism is the basis of Al-Qaeda. They have exported this evil for decades, yet are protected by the United States for geopolitical reasons. A lot of Saudi money flows into Pakistan, a violent and dysfunctional Muslim country. The Times would never have said that either.

The incompetent Indian army and police spent three days tracking down about 10 Muslim "gunmen". Other news reports claimed the terrorists stood for 40 minutes shooting up a train station while police refused to stop them as one man screamed for them to shoot back. It was all on security camera's as one young Muslim killer smiled into it.

To quote some of this useless article,

"The casualties ran the gamut of Mumbai society. A street vendor was shot and killed near the main train station...A manager at the Oberoi survived a bullet wound to his leg but was taken to the Cama and Albless Hospital, where a shootout erupted; he died after being transferred to a second hospital. A chef at the Taj who had been hiding under a kitchen table for most of the night was discovered by four gunmen, made to stand up and shot from behind..."

Guess the chef was also a Zionist. Under Muslim Law the killing of pagans such as Hindus is allowed. Some reports claimed the killers asked the identity of potential victims, releasing Muslims and killing non-Muslims.

Sophisticated Attacks, but by Whom?

New York Times November 28, 2008 To quote,

"The assaults represented a marked departure in scope and ambition from other recent terrorist attacks in India, which have singled out local people rather than foreigners and hit single rather than multiple targets.

The Mumbai assault, by contrast, was seemed directed at foreigners, involved hostage taking and was aimed at multiple and highly symbolic targets."

Here the Times give us a clue to the other numerous Muslim terror attacks in India without saying who. To further quote,

"Indians will have a strong incentive to link this to Al Qaeda, but this is a domestic issue. This is not India's 9/11."

Now we are back to this mysterious Al Qaeda used as a cover for radical Islam. They go on again calling the killers "militants" and some nonsense called "Deccan Mujahedeen." No such organization is known to exist.

They mentioned through an anonymous official the Indian Mujahedeen, which has been implicated in a string of bombing attacks in India killing about 200 people this year alone...Christine Fair, senior political scientist and a South Asia expert at the RAND Corporation, was "careful" to say that the identity of the terrorists could not yet be known.

But she pointed to India's domestic problems, and long tensions between Hindus, who make up about 80 percent of India's population of 1.13 billion, and Muslims, who make up 13.4 percent. Is everybody scared to say Muslim and Islam?

"There are a lot of very, very angry Muslims in India," Ms. Fair said. "The economic disparities are startling and India has been very slow to publicly embrace its rising Muslim problem. You cannot put lipstick on this pig. This is a major domestic political challenge for India."

The public political face of India says,

"Our Muslims have not been radicalized...But the Indian intelligence apparatus knows that's not true. India's Muslim communities are being sucked into the global landscape of Islamist jihad."

The real reason for the "economic disparities" is because Muslim culture makes operating a modern economy or business impossible. Successful Hindus adopt the successful Western model, rejected by Islam. Linking this to economics is nonsense to begin with - millions of poor Hindus are not executing Jews.

It seems anywhere where Muslims can't rule they resort to terrorism. Again they try hard to claim outside influence on this attack, but while the money and training might be from outside, the Muslim problem is in India. Because the West in general refuses to take decisive action against political Islam, Muslim terrorists see these tactics as a win.

To quote the Washington Post,

Shabir Sayed, 30, was buying a pack of cigarettes outside the packed Leopold Cafe on Wednesday night when he heard gunfire and saw men in black hooded sweatshirts with guns. "I saw the gunmen, and they were young men, in jeans with assault rifles. We were so scared. People were ducking under their tables," he said.

With a camera swinging from his neck, Shane Martens, 25, had just arrived from Ireland and was headed to bed in his guest room above the cafe when he heard "huge bangs going off, which at first I thought was just the noise of the horns and firecrackers of India. But then you could hear the screaming."

He ran downstairs to find the recently festive cafe -- where earlier in the evening he had downed a few beers and a bowl of noodles -- in total mayhem. "People huddled together. Shards of glass and food and drinks were knocked down," Martens said. "Everyone was terrified." More than 10 people at the cafe were shot, witnesses said. Blocks away, gunmen began shooting through windows and into the narrow alleyways near the Jewish center.

Sanjay Kokate, a local political leader who said he was part of a self-appointed citizens police force, said he saw random shooting coming from the Jewish center and later realized that several residents had been shot in their living rooms and kitchens. "We heard bang-bang in the alleyway and first thought it was firecrackers.

But then we heard horrible grief, and a woman ran out covered in the blood of her mother," said Kokate, who was guarding the area, a stick swinging from his arm. "We saw two older women were shot dead while cooking dinner in their kitchens," he said. "We helped carry the bodies out. People have been trapped inside their apartments ever since. It's so horrifying."

More "horrifying" is the silence of Muslims that refuse to renounce this slaughter. Print a cartoon of Mohammed, then watch them pour into the streets.

Some Updates

December 8, 2008 New York Times extract

Muslims in India Put Aside Grievances to Repudiate Terrorism

Throngs of Indian Muslims...marched through the heart of Mumbai and several other cities on Sunday, holding up banners proclaiming their condemnation of terrorism and loyalty to the Indian state.

The protests, though relatively small...Muslim leaders have refused to allow the bodies of the nine militants (Muslim terrorists) killed in the attacks to be buried in Islamic cemeteries, saying the men were not true Muslims.

But the New York Times PC police couldn't help themselves. Then they went on: They (the Indian Muslims) also suspended the annual Dec. 6 commemoration of a 1992 riot in which Hindus destroyed a mosque, in an effort to avert communal tension. Muslim religious scholars and public figures have issued strongly worded condemnations of the attacks.

Then they bring up "Hindu right-wing groups" as if they are at fault somehow. The NYT reports 40 Muslims were among the victims might have been the real reason the Indian Muslims reacted. We will never know. To further quote,

"Still, many Muslims seem anxious, fearing that some of the anger unleashed by the attacks may be directed into the Hindu-Muslim violence that has often marred India's modern history.

"It's a pity we have to prove ourselves as Indians," said Mohammed Siddique, a young accountant who was marching in the protest here on Sunday afternoon with his wife and mother. "But the fact is, we need to speak louder than others, to make clear that those people do not speak for our religion - and that we are not Pakistanis."

Wait a minute, now they are Pakistanis deflecting from the fact they were Muslims and killed for Muslim causes.

Other protest banners said:

"Our Country's Enemies are Our Enemies"

"Killers of Innocents are Enemies of Islam"

"Pakistan Be Declared Terrorist State"

Now Muslims Become Victims

Unlike the most recent attackers, who are all believed to be Pakistani, four of six members of the earlier plot were Indian.

There have been killings of Muslims "like the 2002 mass killings of Muslims in the state of Gujarat that left 1,100 dead." According to other news reports "The riots in 2002 erupted after 59 Hindu pilgrims died in a train fire first blamed on a Muslim mob but which an inquiry later concluded was accidental.

Several investigations at the state and federal level have alleged police failed to protect Muslims, who accounted for most of the estimated 2,000 people killed in the pogrom."

In the same area, on Monday 28 July 2008, after bombings two days before, at least 45 were killed and more than 160 wounded in the blasts, according to official figures. (AFP) One of the terrorists referred to the Gujarat riots before he shot and killed a hostage in an effort to identify his own cause with that of Indian Muslims...

December 9, 2008 NYT extract

Pakistan Raids Group Tied to Attacks

...American intelligence and counterterrorism officials told The New York Times that Pakistan's spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, continued nurturing the group, even after 9/11, when the Pakistani government pledged to sever its ties with militant groups...

The Pakistani government has resisted the notion that Pakistani citizens may have been involved in the Mumbai attacks, and it has so far refused to hand over 20 criminal and terrorist suspects long demanded by the Indians...

A senior Pakistani official said the operation was part of a gradual effort to bring the militants under control..."Pakistan will do it at its own pace, not at gunpoint," said a senior politician in the Pakistan Peoples Party, who declined to be named because he was not authorized to speak...

Police officials in India, meanwhile, said they had identified the hometowns of all 10 known gunmen - all of them from Punjab Province in Pakistan - and said they had evidence further establishing the Pakistani origins of the men.

"There are mailboxes from Pakistan, there are medical kits from Pakistan," said Rakesh Maria, the joint police commissioner in Mumbai who is in charge of the case. "The rations - the flour, the rice - that has markings from places in Pakistan."

Western denial: The fact that terrorist fish are swimming in a hospitable Muslim sea nearly disappears amidst Western political, journalistic, and academic bleatings. Call it political correctness, multiculturalism, or self-loathing; whatever the name, this mentality produces delusion and dithering. D. Pipes