Why the TVA Sucks
August 1, 2009 Knoxville, Tenn. (AP) - The Tennessee Valley Authority has reported a $167 million loss for the third quarter blamed on slumping electric sales and rising costs to clean up a massive coal ash spill in Tennessee. The nation's largest public utlity reported the loss Friday on $2.5 billion in revenue, compared to a $100 million gain for the same period a year ago. Power sales were down 8.4 percent, mostly from large industrial customers. TVA says it has raised its recognized expenses for the cleanup of the Kingston Fossil Plant coal ash spill last December to $933 million, and has actually spent $143 million so far. TVA Chief Financial Officer Kim Greene says an electric rate hike is likely.
BHC (December 7, 2008) reports TVA's top 11 executives and two former executives who left during that year received about $11 million in salaries, incentives and deferred compensation, according to salary and compensation records requested by the Bristol Herald Courier. The authority's nine-member, part-time board of directors was paid a combined $371,800. In recent months, TVA imposed a nearly 20 percent average increase in rates - blaming the hike on skyrocketing power-production costs. The increase kicked in Oct. 1 and means the average residential customer is paying about $18 more a month.
TVA is a federal corporation overseen by the U.S. government, TVA supplies power to about 9 million people in seven southeastern states, including about 50,000 Tennessee and Virginia customers residing in the greater Bristol area. Earlier this decade, Congress approved a new governance structure for TVA that mandated significant changes and shifted responsibilities to executives who replaced the former three-member, full-time board of directors that oversaw operations. TVA will be stuck with the cost of a massive sludge spill that will be charged back to customers.
To quote one local resident:
Yes, Its a real shame. But the real truth is they are not the only crooks. If you look at all companies in the Tri-Cities area that are paying cheap wages and upper management execs and owners are walking away with it's the same thing. I think they need to do away with the Bristol (Chamber of) Commerce because its ran by the same crooks. For, example you can not get your car fixed any more or serviced because the mechanics do not get paid enough to care. I think they only get paid ten dollars an hour. And I can go on and on. But, the real truth is, they are not the only crooks out there. I sure am glad that Obama supports unions. We need them in this area. If you can get the people to stick together. But If we continue to work for it, they will continue to pay it. If the company decides to leave the people have not lost any thing. That's the way I feel.
TVA and Vasoline
Tennessee Valley Authority President and CEO Tom Kilgore claims that 124 industrial plants in the TVA service area have slammed the doors since October 2008. That's a loss of 20,000 jobs and this troubles Mr. Kilgore. He claims, "When we sell less kilo-watt hours, every kilo-watt hour sale has a fixed cost recovery in it. To recover some of the depreciation, and some of out interest, and some of our taxes, so as we sell less, the pressure is there. We still have to pay our taxes, we still have to pay our interest, and we still have to account for our asset investment."
That means when electric demand decreases, electric rates will increase! So efforts by customers in Bristol to cut back to save on their staggering power bills will only mean more rate increases. They did get a small decrease recently due to lower fuel charges, but now that will be gone too in addition to all the job losses.
The Johnson City Power Board being hit on the bottom line like Bristol Virginia Utilities did when Crowley Foods Dumps Bristol. To quote Robert White of the Johnson City Power Board, "If customers relocate, we lose customers. If they stay in the area, it still can impact our customers, because if customers don't have jobs, then they are really under the gun to pay electric bills."
While the press claims "nothing is set in stone," they again can't connect the dots. On the one end we will be charged for over capacity and incompetence at TVA, and on the other we will be charged perhaps $800 million (they already spent almost $70 million) for an ash spill in Kingston, Tennessee. In addition to all of these problems TVA's retirement accounts have "shrunk" from $8 billion to about $5 billion due to Wall Street stupidity. Guess who gets to make all of that up?
In the middle of all of that chaos the TVA Board voted purchase 2000 megawatts of so-called "green" energy by 2011. This is all part of the power provider's plan to get fifty percent of its total supply by 2020. According to the New York Times (March 29, 2009) this is the most expensive way to generate power costing even more than a nuclear power plant. What about all the over capacity they already have? To quote:
wind and solar power are generally more expensive than the fossil fuels they are meant to supplant. If carbon dioxide penalties made coal power more expensive, as some environmentalists argue is inevitable, the relative cost of renewable energy might decrease. But consumers will still pay more...
The cost of solar thermal electricity, made by using the sun's heat to boil water and spin a turbine, would be nearly three times that of coal and more than twice that of natural gas. (It would be almost double the cost of wind energy, too.)...
A modern coal plant of conventional design, without technology to capture carbon dioxide before it reaches the air, produces at about 7.8 cents a kilowatt-hour; a high-efficiency natural gas plant, 10.6 cents; and a new nuclear reactor, 10.8 cents...But if a utility relied on a great many wind machines, it would need to back them up with conventional generators in places where demand tends to peak on hot summer days with no breeze. That pushes the price up to just over 12 cents, making it more than 50 percent more expensive than a kilowatt-hour for coal...
The entire concept of "carbon capture" is just asinine. And even more problems. To quote BHC April 2 2009, "TVA has also been named in a lawsuit by the State of North Carolina for air emission problems at four of their coal fired power plants. Locally, the John Sevier Plant in Hawkins County (TN) is one of the facilities named in the suit."
With TVA as a power provider perhaps the public should invest in Vasoline.
| Guestbook |
| Visitors since March 2002 |
This free script provided by
JavaScript Kit