|
Transfer Isn't The Forbidden Word It Used To BeBy Arlene Peck December 13, 2000 Funny, how not so long ago, when I would mention the word, "transfer" editors would write disclaimers about my radical writing. Readers would deplore my views and prevail upon publishers not to carry my columns. Aw, but that was before the bitter realization set in that "No, we just can't all get along together" It upsets me, as a member of the press how easily people are manipulated and after a while, 'buzz words' become fact. Terrorist are 'suicide bombers' More terrorist are 'Militants" or better yet, "Freedom Fighters" or "Guerrillas " The West Bank and Gaza are no longer 'disputed' as opposed to 'occupied territory" Although the latter term indicates that it was 'free' before and 'conquered' later by Israel. Arafat has spent the past twenty-five years promoting the 'big lie' of the occupied land of "Palestinian" and, apparently gotten away with it. What in the hell is Palestinian anyway? If any of you are familiar when it was founded and by whom by all means contact me. Although Arafat is claiming Jerusalem as it's capital, before he put dibs on it, what was it capital and what were it's major cities? In fact, what constituted the basis of its economy? I think I'm on a roll. Did they have a special language for this country of "Palestine" or a prevalent religion? Are all those artifacts that are riddled throughout Israel with the Hebrew writing, really Palestinian artifacts? Wow, then if so, then someone out there must know of a library where I could find works of Palestinian literature, which were written before that magical year of 1967, and Arafat began his big lie of the 'lost homeland' for the Palestinians? Interesting how there has been no leader since Arafat. Were there any Palestinian presidents or Prime Ministers before him? Do any of my journalist collages that lament the demise of this once proud nation have any idea of what it was so proud of? Surely since there are only eight Noble Prize winners in the entire Arab nations, including Chairman Arafat and Sadat, compared with the hundreds of Jewish recipients, then some of them must have originated in the proud nation of Palestinian? I think that my educated journalist have somehow mistaken these illusive people with the Biblical Philistines. I have been writing for a long time about the needed 'transfer' to the region. The present situation of constant bombings of its citizens is intolerable. The only thing those that are trained in the fine art of death and destruction is power. First you must defeat them, and then you can negotiate. Every time a resort, or school bus, or pizza parlor is bombed, Israel should announce that they are taking back 10% of the cities that the mistakenly given them and then ..do it! If they do it again, then another ten percent of land reverts back into Jewish hands. Enough of bombing empty hovels with plenty of notice so the European Union can rebuild them back better than ever with their twenty-six million grants. It's not that impossible. Housing could be implemented in Jordan to remove the terrorist threat from Israel. To be more specific, the southern Half of Jordan is not only unpopulated but also poor. Think what a windfall it would be to that country if a consortium of nations, similar to the same ones who regularly fill the corrupt coffers of Arafat and his thugs to the tune of billions of dollars, sent that money to Jordan? This money could be used to get those wretched people out of the hovels in the 'refugee camps' that their Arab brothers have happily kept them in for the past fifty years. These nations and bankers could phase in the building of two viable designed cities to accommodate two million people into each city. Use some of that capitalistic know-how and give them no money down and thirty year financing for new homes, business locations, and investment property. Israelis will buy and pay in cash for the properties and business the Palestinians leave behind. The Israelis could recoup their money by reselling to developers, investors and individuals. The Arabs would then have money in the bank and a better home and environment than what they now have. Jordan and the world would benefit because with development comes peace and business would boom in the area by such a massive building project. After the earthquakes here, the local developers, builders, electrical companies, etc. were busy for years because of the misfortune caused by the quake. Think of the companies who make the material and products necessary would grow and how the economies of the participating countries would benefit. How long would it be before travel and industry become available? Jordan would probably be thrilled as the money could pour into that country and for the first time and the King could set the standard for democracy which has never been tried before. Whatever, when people are making money they tend to be a happier crowd. The work force in Israel among the Arabs has dried up and will be many years, if ever, because it returns again. Those from the Philippines and Romania have now replaced the Palestinians who used to travel into Israel proper to do the work that the Israeli's didn't want to do. Something other than what is being done has to be tried. These fictitious Palestinians have only one motivation. That being, the complete and utter destruction of Israel. Presently these people are nothing more than a terrorist organization that must be destroyed.
See Judiasm versus Deism and Gnosticism
Back to
Visitors since
|