Remembering Malcolm X Fifty Years Later
by Daniel Pipes
Feb 21, 2015
Cross-posted from National Review Online, The Corner
Original title: Remembering Malcolm X Fifty Years Later
On this date fifty years ago, the man best known as Malcolm X was killed by a Nation of Islam (NoI) hit squad while speaking on in Harlem, New York.
Born Malcolm Little in Omaha on May 19, 1925, to a Baptist minister father and West Indian mother, both politically involved, he lived on the streets of various eastern U.S. cities until he was jailed in February 1946, where, a year later, he began his self-education program. He first learned about the NoI from his brother in about April 1948 and joined it later that year. Three weeks after his release from jail in 1952, he met Elijah Muhammad, the NoI leader, and commemorated his new identity by throwing off his "slave name" in favor of Malcolm X.
From 1953 on, he devoted himself full time to building the Nation. In an eye-opening experience, he traveled to the Middle East in 1959, after which he began to adopt normative Islamic practices and become more critical of NoI, eventually changing his name to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz and then breaking with the NoI in March 1964, when he started a new movement, the Muslim Mosque, Inc.
He went on the hajj to Mecca a month later, followed by other Middle Eastern and African travels. Outraged by what he perceived as Malcolm X's treachery, Elijah Muhammad had him murdered on February 21, 1965, apparently under the supervision of Louis Farrakhan. Were he still alive, Malcolm X would be approaching his 90th birthday.
What to make of the Malcolm X legacy on this 50th anniversary? He was a quick study, a natural politician, and a powerful orator, as well as a highly original political figure, He played a major role both in the large-scale conversion of African-Americans to Islam in both its NoI and normative variants (his Autobiography continues to be cited as a major inspiration for becoming Muslim), and to the development of black nationalism, a milder form of his preferred solution that blacks withdraw from the United States and form their own country.
His presence remains alive; and thanks to Spike Lee's movie about him, a U.S. postal stamp in his honor, and other signs of mainstream acceptance, he has become a somewhat anodyne figure. Here's how NBC News characterized him today, on the anniversary: "By the time he died, the Muslim leader had moderated his militant message of black separatism and pride but was still very much a passionate advocate of black unity, self-respect and self-reliance."
But Malcolm X was anything but mainstream and the passage of a half century should not soften attitudes toward him. To the end, he remained a radical, polarizing, bigoted figure, Martin Luther King's evil Doppelganger. To support this description, recall two notorious statements. The first dates from Dec. 1, 1963, shortly after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, when Malcolm X responded with the comment that, "Being an old farm boy myself, chickens coming home to roost never did make me sad; they've always made me glad."
The second came in the course of a meeting with the Ku Klux Klan (itself a insight into his extremism) intended to win white racist support for the NoI black separatism project. According to a FBI report, Malcolm X assured the Klansmen that Jews were behind the integration movement they both despised. Joshua Muravchik concludes from this incident that Malcolm X "was a vociferous anti-Semite in both public and in private."
Malcolm X should accurately be remembered as the extremist he was. (February 21, 2015)
This text may be reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with complete and accurate information provided about its author, date, place of publication, and original URL.
Dane Defends Press Freedom as Muslims Protest Cartoons
As Islamic protests spread about cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad in a Danish newspaper, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish prime minister, defended press freedom in his country on Tuesday but distanced himself from the newspaper's decision to publish the drawings. His remarks fell far short of the apology demanded by an array of Islamic groups and countries which have imposed a remarkably successful boycott of Danish products...
Read the full story at New York Times.
- Fear and Loathing of Islam is not Islamophobia
- Scientific Case for a Transcendent God
- In Defense of Classical Deism
- Libya's War on Christians
- Terrorism Defies Definition
- In Defense of Europe's So-called Far Right
- When Saudi-backed Terrorists Come Home to Roost
- Malcolm X Should be Remembered as the Extremist
- More European Papers Print Cartoons of Muhammad
- How Best to Fight the 'Islamophobia Industry'
- Professors on Paris Attacks - Je Suis NOT Charlie!
- Is CAIR a Terror Group?
- Theo van Gogh and "Education By Murder" in Holland
- Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism
- Clash to End All Clashes? Making sense of the cartoon jihad
- Muslims March over Cartoons of the Prophet
- Cartoon jihad is not about hate censorship but Islam
- 2006 is shaping up to be the 'Year of Speaking Dangerously'
- Fury over Islam cartoons, calls for restraint
- Print Free or Die
- Sympathy for those who draw Anne Frank in bed with Hitler?
- Today it's some Mohammed cartoons; tomorrow it is you they will silence
- Curse of the Muslim moderates
- Western wimps missing chance to teach important lesson
- Submission is all in your dhimmitude