St. Augustine: Anti-Manicheanism and Pelagian Writings
What is Manicheanism? Manicheanism (sometimes Manichaeism or Manichaeanism) was one of the major ancient religions of Persian (ancient Iran) origin. Though its organized form is mostly extinct today, a revival has been attempted under the name of Neo-Manicheanism. However, most of the writings of the founding prophet Mani have been lost.
Some scholars argue that its influence subtly continues in Western Christian thought via Augustine of Hippo, who converted to Christianity from Manicheanism, which he passionately denounced in his writings. The most striking principle of Manichee theology is its dualism, a theme gleaned from the Persian religion of Zoroastrianism. Mani postulated two natures that existed from the beginning: light and darkness.
The realm of light lived in peace, while the realm of darkness was in constant conflict with itself. The universe is the temporary result of an attack of the realm of darkness on the realm of light, and was created by the Living Spirit, an emanation of the light realm, out of the mixture of light and darkness. (Theopedia)
His special and direct opposition to Manicheanism did not last a great while
after his consecration. About 397 he wrote a tractate Contra epistolam
[Manichcet] quam vocant fundamenti; in the De agone christiano,
written about the same time, and in the Confessiones, a little later,
numerous anti-Manichean expressions occur.
After this, however, he only attacked the Manicheans on some special occasion, as when, about 400, on the request of his "brethren," he wrote a detailed rejoinder to Faustus, a Manichean bishop, or made the treatise De natura boni out of his discussions with Felix; a little later, also, the letter of the Manichean Secundinus gave him occasion to write Contra Secundinum, which, in spite of its comparative brevity, he regarded as the best of his writings on this subject.
In the succeeding period, lie was much more occupied with anti-Donatist polemics, which in their turn were forced to take second place by the emergence of the Pelagian controversy.
It has been thought that Augustine's anti-Pelagian teaching grew out of his conception of the Church and its sacraments as a means of salvation; and attention was called to the fact that before the Pelagian controversy this aspect of the Church had, through the struggle with the Donatists, assumed special importance in his mind.
But this conception should be denied. It is
quite true that in 395 Augustine's views on sin and grace, freedom and
predestination, were not what they afterward came to be. But the new trend was
given to them before the time of his anti-Donatist activity, and so before he
could have heard anything of Pelagius.
What we call Augustinianism was not a reaction against Pelagianism; it would be much truer to say that the latter was a reaction against Augustine's views. He himself names the beginning of his episcopate as the turning-point.
Accordingly, in the first thing which he wrote
after his consecration, the De diversis gucestionibus ad Simplicianum
(396 or 397), we come already upon the new conception. In no other of his
writings do we see as plainly the gradual attainment of conviction on any point;
as he himself says in the Retractationes, he was laboring for the free
choice of the will of man, but the grace of God won the day.
So completely was it won, that we might set forth the specifically Augustinian teaching on grace, as against the Pelagians and the Massilians, by a series of quotations taken wholly from this treatise.
It is true that much of his later teaching is still undeveloped here; the question of predestination (though the word is used) does not really come up; he is not clear as to the term " election"; and nothing is said of the " gift of perseverance."
But what we get on these points later is
nothing but the logical consequence of that which is expressed here, and so we
have the actual genesis of Augustine's predestinarian teaching under our eyes.
It is determined by no reference to the question of infant baptism -- still less
by any considerations connected with the conception of the Church.
The impulse comes directly from Scripture, with the help, it is true, of those exegetical thoughts which he mentioned earlier as those of others and not his own. To be sure, Paul alone can not explain this doctrine of grace; this is evident from the fact that the very definition of grace is non-Pauline.
Grace is for
Augustine, both now and later, not the misericordia peccata condonans of
the Reformers, as justification is not the alteration of the relation to God
accomplished by means of the accipere remissionem.
Grace is rather the misericordia which displays itself in the divine inspiratio and justification is justum or pium fieri as a result of this. We may even say that this grace is an interne illuminatio such as a study of Augustine's Neoplatonism enables us easily to understand, which restores the connection with the divine bonum esse.
He had long been convinced that "
not only the greatest but also the smallest good things can not be, except from
him from whom are all good things, that is, from God;" and it might well seem to
him to follow from this that faith, which is certainly a good thing, could
proceed from the operation of God alone.
This explains the idea that grace works like a law of nature, drawing the human will to God with a divine omnipotence. Of course this Neoplatonic coloring must not be exaggerated; it is more consistent with itself in his earlier writings than in the later, and he would never have arrived at his predestinarian teaching without the New Testament.
With this knowledge, we are in a position to estimate the force of a difficulty which now confronted Augustine for the first time, but never afterward left him, and which has been present in the Roman Catholic teaching even down to the Councils of Trent and the Vitican.
If faith depends upon an action of our own,
solicited but not caused by vocation, it can only save a man when, per fidem
gratiam accipiens, he becomes one who not merely believes in God but loves
But if faith has been already inspired by grace, and if, while the Scripture speaks of justification by faith, it is held (in accordance with the definition of grace) that justification follows upon the infitsio caritatis, -then either the conception of the faith which is God-inspired must pass its fluctuating boundaries and, approach nearer to that of caritas, or the conception of faith which is unconnected with caritas will render the fact of its inspiration unintelligible and justification by faith impossible.
Augustine's anti-Pelagian writings set forth this doctrine of grace more clearly in some points, such as the terms " election," " predestination," " the gift of perseverance," and also more logically; but space forbids us to show this here, as the part taken in this controversy by Augustine is so fully detailed elsewhere.
Extract from St Augustine IEP 2001 Ref url: http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/a/augustin.htm
- Saint Augustine His Christian World View by Lewis Loflin
- 2017 Website Updates & Deletions
- Web Master Homepage
- Bristol, Southwest Virginia Revealed
- Science & Technology
- Hobby Electronics
- US Constitution
- Christianity 101
- Religious Themes
- Notes on Neoplatonism
- Early Christian and Medieval Neoplatonism
- Pelagius: To Demetrias, why he was cleared of heresy
- Pelagius: Chapters
- Pelagius and why he was right.
- Defense Of The Freedom Of The Will
- How Christianity drew on Philo's synthesis of Judaism and Hellenism
- Biblical Monotheism an Overview
- Jesus was not Zoroaster or Buddha
- Judaism Versus Zoroastrianism
- What are we to believe?
- The Devil
- Hellenism Meets Judaism
- Zoroastrianism Sources
» Archive 1 » Archive 2 » Archive 3
» Archive 4 » Archive 5 » Archive 6
» Archive 7 » Archive 8 » Archive 9